<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>PressHarbor Support Forums &#187; Tag: redirection - Recent Posts</title>
<link>http://support.pressharbor.com/discuss/</link>
<description>PressHarbor Support Forums &#187; Tag: redirection - Recent Posts</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:33:07 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>PressHarbor Support on "redirection of old BlogHarbor permanent links"</title>
<link>http://support.pressharbor.com/discuss/topic/redirection-of-old-blogharbor-permanent-links#post-154</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 21:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>PressHarbor Support</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">154@http://support.pressharbor.com/discuss/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;&#38;gt; Can you explain a little of the technical background on how the redirection (to new PressHarbor) of old BlogHarbor permanent links works?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;We send 301 HTTP codes to redirect the original urls to their new equivalent,&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#38;gt; Some of my Google search results come up arlingtoncardinal.blogharbor.com/_archive ... and some come up arlingtoncardinal.com/_article ...&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Is that really the case? I don't think either of those are actual Blogware URLs, but regardless yes, we think our redirections work properly for as many cases as we could find over the past nearly 2 years we have been doing Blogware migrations.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>arlingtoncardinal on "redirection of old BlogHarbor permanent links"</title>
<link>http://support.pressharbor.com/discuss/topic/redirection-of-old-blogharbor-permanent-links#post-149</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 06:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>arlingtoncardinal</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">149@http://support.pressharbor.com/discuss/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Can you explain a little of the technical background on how the redirection (to new PressHarbor) of old BlogHarbor permanent links works?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Some of my Google search results come up arlingtoncardinal.blogharbor.com/_archive ... and some come up arlingtoncardinal.com/_article ...&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I am wondering if both types would have successful redirection.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>PressHarbor Support on "redirection plugin update"</title>
<link>http://support.pressharbor.com/discuss/topic/redirection-plugin-update#post-57</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 09:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>PressHarbor Support</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">57@http://support.pressharbor.com/discuss/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;No, it is not a good idea to just download and install it...&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;This plugin is one that we install by default, and will regularly update on your behalf. We just pushed out an update to all blogs, updating your WordPress and pre-installed plugins to their latest versions, so you should be current now.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>deswalsh on "redirection plugin update"</title>
<link>http://support.pressharbor.com/discuss/topic/redirection-plugin-update#post-56</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 06:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>deswalsh</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">56@http://support.pressharbor.com/discuss/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;There is a notice of an updated version of the redirection update plugin. Is it a good idea to just download that and install it, or will that entail more configuring?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

